The key concept to use in this question is conservation of energy. As the same explosive charge is used, we can assume that the total energy added to the system (through chemical potential energy of the explosives) is the same.
So, for the first scenario (when the cannon was not mounted rigidly), the chemical potential energy has been converted to kinetic energy of the cannon and the kinetic energy of the cannonball. On the other hand, for the second scenario (when the cannon was mounted rigidly), the chemical potential energy has been converted to only the kinetic energy of the cannonball. Here is how I would set the equation.
∑Ei = ∑Ef
KEc + KEb1 = KEb2
0.5Mc(Vc)^2 + 0.5Mb(Vb1)^2 = 0.5Mb(Vb2)^2
Mc(Vc)^2 + Mb(Vb1)^2 = Mb(Vb2)^2
2080(0.885528846)^2 + 16.3(113)^2 = 16.3(Vb2)^2
Vb2 = 113.4419003701 m/s
As the question is asking how much faster would the ball travel, the answer would be 113.4419003701 m/s - 113 m/s = 0.4419003701 m/s.
So for the second part, we don't have to worry about the conservation of momentum? Cuz shouldn't something go backwards when the cannonball is shot forwards?
It is not necessary to use CoP for the second part as you can simply find it using conservation of energy as the question stated to disregard friction. In terms of momentum, theoretically, yes. Something would go backwards to keep the momentum zero. However, as the cannon is mounted rigidly, treat the cannon and the ground as the same object. The velocity of the cannon/earth would be negligible as its mass is extremely extremely high, right? So, for these types of questions, don't worry about the conservation of momentum.
Sure, thank you for your question.
The key concept to use in this question is conservation of energy. As the same explosive charge is used, we can assume that the total energy added to the system (through chemical potential energy of the explosives) is the same.
So, for the first scenario (when the cannon was not mounted rigidly), the chemical potential energy has been converted to kinetic energy of the cannon and the kinetic energy of the cannonball. On the other hand, for the second scenario (when the cannon was mounted rigidly), the chemical potential energy has been converted to only the kinetic energy of the cannonball. Here is how I would set the equation.
∑Ei = ∑Ef
KEc + KEb1 = KEb2
0.5Mc(Vc)^2 + 0.5Mb(Vb1)^2 = 0.5Mb(Vb2)^2
Mc(Vc)^2 + Mb(Vb1)^2 = Mb(Vb2)^2
2080(0.885528846)^2 + 16.3(113)^2 = 16.3(Vb2)^2
Vb2 = 113.4419003701 m/s
As the question is asking how much faster would the ball travel, the answer would be 113.4419003701 m/s - 113 m/s = 0.4419003701 m/s.
Does this answer your question?